20240213:修订间差异
DanielM (Daniel)(讨论 | 贡献) 无编辑摘要 |
DanielM (Daniel)(讨论 | 贡献) 无编辑摘要 |
||
第39行: | 第39行: | ||
|26: | |26: | ||
|27: | |27: | ||
|28: IB, almost ii 27/28, after 3 push up (WT), at EMA, can sell here or after good bear bar b29 | |28: IB, almost ii 27/28, after 3 push up (WT), at EMA, can sell here or after good bear bar b29. If breaks to upside as failed wedge can accelerate up as BTC and go for MM up, but why didn't this happen already on b26-28? At this point looks like a spike (b10-14) and channel (18-27) with minimum objective to test the beginning of the channel (18L). | ||
|29: | |29: | ||
|30: | |30: |
2024年2月14日 (三) 01:34的版本
Previous Day: 20240212 | BPAX E-mini Daily Review | Next Day: 20240214 |
1: | 2: | 3: | 4: | 5: | 6: | 7: | 8: | 9: | 10: WB 🟩 |
11: | 12: | 13: | 14: | 15: | 16: | 17: | 18: | 19: | 20: |
21: | 22: | 23: | 24: | 25: | 26: | 27: | 28: IB, almost ii 27/28, after 3 push up (WT), at EMA, can sell here or after good bear bar b29. If breaks to upside as failed wedge can accelerate up as BTC and go for MM up, but why didn't this happen already on b26-28? At this point looks like a spike (b10-14) and channel (18-27) with minimum objective to test the beginning of the channel (18L). | 29: | 30: |
31: | 32: | 33: | 34: | 35: | 36: | 37: | 38: | 39: | 40: |
41: | 42: | 43: | 44: | 45: | 46: | 47: | 48: | 49: | 50: |
51: | 52: | 53: | 54: | 55: | 56: | 57: | 58: | 59: | 60: |
61: | 62: | 63: | 64: | 65: | 66: | 67: | 68: | 69: | 70: |
71: | 72: | 73: | 74: | 75: | 76: | 77: | 78: | 79: | 80: |