20240213：修订间差异
DanielM (Daniel)（讨论 | 贡献） 无编辑摘要 |
无编辑摘要 |
||
| （未显示另一用户的1个中间版本） | |||
| 第39行： | 第39行： | ||
|26: | |26: | ||
|27: | |27: | ||
|28: IB, almost ii 27/28, after 3 push up (WT), at EMA, can sell here or after good bear bar b29 | |28: IB, almost ii 27/28, after 3 push up (WT), at EMA, can sell here or after good bear bar b29. If breaks to upside as failed wedge can accelerate up as BTC and go for MM up, but why didn't this happen already on b26-28? At this point looks like a spike (b10-14) and channel (18-27) with minimum objective to test the beginning of the channel (18L). | ||
|29: | |29: | ||
|30: | |30: | ||
| 第100行： | 第100行： | ||
== <small>BTC Review</small> == | == <small>BTC Review</small> == | ||
[[File:20240213-AL.jpg|center|thumb|800x800px]] | |||
[[分类:Daily Setup 2024]] | [[分类:Daily Setup 2024]] | ||
2024年2月18日 (日) 17:44的最新版本
| Previous Day: 20240212 | BPAX E-mini Daily Review | Next Day: 20240214 |
| 1: | 2: | 3: | 4: | 5: | 6: | 7: | 8: | 9: | 10: WB 🟩 |
| 11: | 12: | 13: | 14: | 15: | 16: | 17: | 18: | 19: | 20: |
| 21: | 22: | 23: | 24: | 25: | 26: | 27: | 28: IB, almost ii 27/28, after 3 push up (WT), at EMA, can sell here or after good bear bar b29. If breaks to upside as failed wedge can accelerate up as BTC and go for MM up, but why didn't this happen already on b26-28? At this point looks like a spike (b10-14) and channel (18-27) with minimum objective to test the beginning of the channel (18L). | 29: | 30: |
| 31: | 32: | 33: | 34: | 35: | 36: | 37: | 38: | 39: | 40: |
| 41: | 42: | 43: | 44: | 45: | 46: | 47: | 48: | 49: | 50: |
| 51: | 52: | 53: | 54: | 55: | 56: | 57: | 58: | 59: | 60: |
| 61: | 62: | 63: | 64: | 65: | 66: | 67: | 68: | 69: | 70: |
| 71: | 72: | 73: | 74: | 75: | 76: | 77: | 78: | 79: | 80: |
