Category:FBO BEMA：修订间差异
无编辑摘要 |
无编辑摘要 |
||
| 第1行： | 第1行： | ||
''[[FBO]] below [[EMA]], | ''[[FBO]] below [[EMA]], a failed breakout, can setup a reasonable long entry when context is right. On [[20230515]], market had a [[SXFO]] then a good [[BLBCH]] bar 10 forming a reasonable [[ORV]] setup, there was no clear [[MSR]] around bar 9, but since 8 is a strong [[BRBO]] below EMA with 9 being a reasonable [[FT]] bar, bears were hoping to breakout below for a [[MM]] down, however, bar 10 as a good BLBCH formed a [[WB]] setup 2-6-10, then 11 closed as a stronger BLBCH and '''closed well above EMA, also above 6L''' the bar 8 bear breakout point, market is telling bear's attempt to breakout below EMA has failed, with a reasonable [[WB]], and 1-10 being a sell climax on the open, this is a reasonable ORV setup. If a swing trader did not buy above 10 concerning about the bear channel being too tight, they should buy above 11 with a little bigger risk but a little higher probability.'' | ||
2023年5月15日 (一) 17:49的版本
FBO below EMA, a failed breakout, can setup a reasonable long entry when context is right. On 20230515, market had a SXFO then a good BLBCH bar 10 forming a reasonable ORV setup, there was no clear MSR around bar 9, but since 8 is a strong BRBO below EMA with 9 being a reasonable FT bar, bears were hoping to breakout below for a MM down, however, bar 10 as a good BLBCH formed a WB setup 2-6-10, then 11 closed as a stronger BLBCH and closed well above EMA, also above 6L the bar 8 bear breakout point, market is telling bear's attempt to breakout below EMA has failed, with a reasonable WB, and 1-10 being a sell climax on the open, this is a reasonable ORV setup. If a swing trader did not buy above 10 concerning about the bear channel being too tight, they should buy above 11 with a little bigger risk but a little higher probability.